On this page: About this objective | Methodology | History
About this objective
Data
Data Sources: National Survey of Family Growth (NSFG), CDC/NCHS; National Vital Statistics System - Natality (NVSS-N), CDC/NCHS; Surveillance Data for Abortion, CDC/NCCDPHP; Guttmacher Institute Abortion Provider Census (APC), Guttmacher Institute; Guttmacher Institute Abortion Patient Survey (APS), Guttmacher Institute
National baseline: 39.7 percent of pregnancies among women aged 15 to 44 years were unintended in 2015
National target: 31.4 percent
Methodology
Questions used to obtain the national baseline data
In nationally representative surveys of women and their pregnancy histories, those who experienced a pregnancy were asked a series of questions referring to their desire for pregnancy just before it occurred. Women who reported not wanting to become pregnant at the time of conception were then asked if they would say the pregnancy occurred too soon. If they respond "yes", researchers have typically referred to these pregnancies as having occurred "too soon" or as "mistimed" pregnancies. Pregnancies among women who reported they had not wanted to become pregnant at the time of conception nor any time in the future have been categorized as "unwanted." Together, mistimed and unwanted pregnancies were considered to be "unintended." Pregnancies among women who reported that the conception occurred at the right time or later than the woman had wanted were considered to be "intended." A small fraction of women reported indifference about the timing of their pregnancies were categorized as intended. In newer research, the incidence of each category is tracked separately to retain information and avoid assumptions about what constitutes an unintended or intended pregnancy.
Methodology notes
History
The data source no longer makes estimates of unintended pregnancies and instead estimates the percentage of pregnancies that either occurred too soon or that was unwanted.
In 2026, the baseline for this objective was revised from 43.0% as reported in 2013 to 39.7% as reported in 2015. Using the original target-setting method, the target was also updated from 36.5% to 31.4%.
Footnotes
1. Because Healthy People 2030 objectives have a desired direction (e.g., increase or decrease), the confidence level of a one-sided prediction interval can be used as an indication of how likely a target will be to achieve based on the historical data and fitted trend.